Biological sciences form the foundational framework for understanding life processes, inter-organismal interactions, and the dynamic relationship between organisms and their environment. Traditionally, zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences evolved as distinct disciplines, each cultivating specialized methodologies, terminologies, and research questions. However, the complexity of contemporary global challenges—including accelerating climate change, emerging infectious diseases, food insecurity, and unprecedented biodiversity loss—demands integrated, interdisciplinary approaches that transcend conventional disciplinary boundaries (Bennett et al., 2021).

Recent decades have witnessed an exponential growth in technological capabilities that are reshaping the scope and depth of biological inquiry. Advances in molecular biology, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS), have enabled researchers to explore organismal genomes with remarkable precision and speed. Simultaneously, the proliferation of bioinformatics tools, remote sensing platforms, unmanned aerial vehicles (drones), and artificial intelligence algorithms has created new opportunities for data-intensive research across biological subdisciplines (Smith et al., 2019; Rolnick et al., 2019).

Despite these advances, much of the existing literature treats zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences in disciplinary isolation. This fragmentation limits the development of holistic, ecosystem-level solutions that address interconnected challenges such as pollinator decline, soil degradation, and zoonotic disease emergence. Bridging these disciplines is not merely academically beneficial—it is practically imperative for designing resilient food systems and conservation strategies in a rapidly changing world.

This review paper aims to comprehensively examine the most significant emerging trends and practical applications across zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences. It further identifies convergence points between the three disciplines and highlights their collective societal relevance. The review is structured as follows: Section 2 synthesizes the relevant literature; Section 3 examines molecular biology and genomics trends; Sections 4, 5, and 6 address discipline-specific trends in zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences, respectively; Section 7 explores interdisciplinary applications; Section 8 discusses challenges and ethical considerations; and Sections 9 and 10 provide future directions and conclusions.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Recent advancements in biological sciences have been driven by the convergence of molecular tools, computational techniques, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. An extensive body of scholarship illuminates the pathways through which technological innovation is reshaping biological research and its practical applications.

2.1 Genomics and Bioinformatics

Smith et al. (2019) documented the transformative impact of genomics and bioinformatics on biological research, demonstrating that next-generation sequencing technologies enable detailed analysis of genetic diversity at the population, species, and ecosystem levels. These findings have accelerated applications in conservation biology, disease diagnostics, and evolutionary studies. Kulski (2020) further highlighted the importance of computational biology in managing large-scale biological datasets, particularly in comparative genomics and transcriptomics, where traditional statistical methods prove insufficient for the volume and complexity of data generated.

2.2 Conservation Genetics and Environmental DNA

In zoological research, Frankham et al. (2017) demonstrated the critical role of conservation genetics in preserving endangered species by maintaining genetic diversity and mitigating inbreeding depression. Their seminal framework continues to underpin modern wildlife management programs globally. Complementarily, Bohmann et al. (2018) pioneered the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a non-invasive tool for biodiversity monitoring, validating its effectiveness in detecting rare and cryptic species in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This methodological innovation has substantially reduced the cost and ecological footprint of biodiversity assessments.

2.3 Animal Behavior and Bio-logging Technologies

Cooke et al. (2016) explored the application of biologging and sensor technologies in animal behavior research, demonstrating that GPS tracking, accelerometers, and bioacoustic sensors have significantly advanced understanding of migration, foraging behavior, and habitat utilization in wildlife. This technological shift has enabled real-time ecological monitoring and data-driven conservation interventions at previously unachievable spatial and temporal resolutions.

2.4 Plant Phenomics and Crop Improvement

Botanical research has undergone remarkable transformation through high-throughput plant phenotyping. Furbank and Tester (2011) identified phenomics as the critical bridge between genotype and phenotype, demonstrating how imaging technologies and automated platforms accelerate crop improvement programs. Fiorani and Schurr (2013) extended this analysis to show that phenomics is essential for understanding complex plant responses to abiotic stressors such as drought, heat, and salinity—traits that are increasingly relevant given global climate projections.

2.5 Plant–Microbe Interactions and Sustainable Agriculture

The role of the plant microbiome has emerged as one of the most dynamic areas of agricultural botany. Vessey (2003) established the foundational importance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in enhancing nutrient uptake and plant resilience. Building on this, Mendes et al. (2018) demonstrated that beneficial soil microbiomes suppress plant pathogens and improve soil health through complex biochemical interactions, providing a biological alternative to synthetic pesticides and fertilizers.

2.6 Precision Agriculture and Resource Efficiency

Agricultural sciences have increasingly adopted precision agriculture frameworks. Zhang et al. (2019) reported that integration of GPS, remote sensing, and variable-rate technology significantly improves crop productivity while reducing resource wastage. Gebbers and Adamchuk (2010) corroborated these findings by demonstrating that site-specific management practices optimize fertilizer and water use, contributing measurably to environmental sustainability. Altieri et al. (2015) complemented this body of work by advocating for agroecological approaches, showing that biodiversity-based farming systems enhance resilience to climate variability while simultaneously improving ecosystem services.

2.7 CRISPR-Cas9 and Biotechnological Applications

The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 as a genome editing platform has fundamentally altered the biotechnological landscape of biological sciences. Doudna and Charpentier (2014) described CRISPR-Cas9 as a revolutionary tool enabling precise genome modification, while Jinek et al. (2016) demonstrated its broad applications in crop improvement, functional genomics, and animal breeding. These advances have simultaneously opened significant scientific opportunities and stimulated complex ethical debates about biosafety and ecological risk.

2.8 Artificial Intelligence in Biology

Artificial intelligence and machine learning represent a cross-cutting frontier in biological sciences. Rolnick et al. (2019) outlined the role of AI in biodiversity conservation, particularly for species identification and habitat monitoring. In agricultural contexts, Liakos et al. (2018) demonstrated how machine learning models support crop disease prediction and yield forecasting with accuracy comparable to expert agronomists, at a fraction of the cost and time.

2.9 Identified Research Gap

Despite significant advances in genomics, precision agriculture, and conservation biology, the existing literature remains predominantly discipline-specific. Few integrative frameworks examine the convergence of zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences as a unified system. This creates a critical gap in understanding ecosystem-level sustainability, holistic biodiversity conservation, and climate-resilient food system design. The present review addresses this gap by synthesizing insights across the three disciplines and proposing a converged analytical model.

EMERGING TRENDS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENOMICS

3.1 Genomic Revolution and Next-Generation Sequencing

Genomics has fundamentally transformed biological research by enabling the analysis of entire genomes rather than individual genes. High-throughput sequencing technologies—including Illumina short-read, Oxford Nanopore long-read, and PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing—allow rapid identification of genetic variations, evolutionary relationships, and functional gene elements across all domains of life (Smith et al., 2019). These platforms have democratized genomic research, reducing per-genome sequencing costs from millions of dollars to under one hundred dollars within two decades.

Key developments in this domain include whole-genome sequencing of plants, animals, and microorganisms; metagenomics for characterizing complex microbial communities without culture requirements; transcriptomics for understanding genome-wide gene expression dynamics under varying environmental conditions; epigenomics for mapping heritable gene regulatory modifications; and multi-omics integration, which combines genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data streams for systems-level biological insights.

Table 1: Major Genomic Approaches and Applications in Biological Sciences

Source: Compiled by authors based on Smith et al. (2019) and Kulski (2020)

3.2 CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing and Biotechnological Applications

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as the most consequential biotechnological development of the 21st century. By harnessing the adaptive immune mechanism of bacteria, CRISPR enables targeted, efficient, and cost-effective genome modification across virtually all organism types (Doudna & Charpentier, 2014). Unlike earlier gene editing tools such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and TALENs, CRISPR offers superior specificity, multiplexing capability, and experimental scalability.

In plant biotechnology, CRISPR has been applied to develop pest- and disease-resistant crop varieties, improve drought and heat tolerance, enhance nutritional quality, and reduce allergenicity in food crops. In zoological research, CRISPR facilitates functional gene studies in model organisms and holds potential for producing disease-resistant livestock breeds. In conservation biology, gene-drive systems based on CRISPR are being explored for population management of invasive species, though these applications demand rigorous ethical review and regulatory oversight (Jinek et al., 2016).

3.3 Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Big Data Analytics

The exponential growth of biological data generated by genomic, remote sensing, and environmental monitoring platforms has necessitated the integration of AI and machine learning into biological research workflows. Deep learning algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in automated species identification from image data, outperforming traditional morphological classification methods in some contexts (Rolnick et al., 2019).

In agricultural sciences, AI-driven decision support systems integrate satellite imagery, soil sensor data, weather models, and historical yield records to produce real-time, field-level recommendations for irrigation, fertilization, and pest management. Natural language processing (NLP) tools are increasingly applied to synthesize knowledge from large bodies of scientific literature, accelerating hypothesis generation and systematic review processes. These capabilities are particularly valuable in resource-limited research settings where expert human capacity is constrained (Liakos et al., 2018).

4. Emerging Trends in Zoology

4.1 Conservation Biology and Wildlife Genetics

Contemporary zoological research is increasingly oriented toward conservation biology as global biodiversity faces unprecedented anthropogenic pressures. An estimated one million species are currently threatened with extinction due to habitat destruction, climate change, invasive species, overexploitation, and pollution (IPBES, 2019). Conservation genetics provides essential tools for assessing the viability of wildlife populations by evaluating genetic diversity, identifying population structure, detecting inbreeding depression, and estimating effective population sizes (Frankham et al., 2017).

Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveillance has emerged as a transformative methodology in biodiversity monitoring. eDNA refers to genetic material shed into the environment through feces, shed skin, mucus, and gametes, which can be collected from water or soil samples and identified using metabarcoding or quantitative PCR techniques. Bohmann et al. (2018) demonstrated the superior sensitivity of eDNA detection for rare and cryptic species compared to conventional trapping and visual survey methods, particularly in freshwater and marine ecosystems. This technology is now being scaled for continent-wide biodiversity assessments.

4.2 Behavioral Ecology and Bio-logging Technologies

The development of miniaturized, multi-sensor biologging devices has catalyzed a revolution in behavioral ecology. Modern bio-loggers integrate GPS receivers, accelerometers, magnetometers, depth sensors, and thermistors into packages small enough to attach to animals as small as songbirds, enabling continuous, high-resolution recording of movement, activity, and physiological state across entire annual cycles (Cooke et al., 2016).

Table 2: Bio-logging Technologies Employed in Contemporary Zoological Research

Source: Compiled by authors based on Cooke et al. (2016) and Bohmann et al. (2018)

4.3 One Health Approach: Integrating Human, Animal, and Environmental Health

The One Health framework represents one of the most significant conceptual advances in 21st-century biological sciences. Recognizing that human health, animal health, and ecosystem health are inextricably interconnected, One Health promotes coordinated, cross-sectoral surveillance and response to emerging infectious diseases. Approximately 75% of new infectious diseases affecting humans originate in animals (zoonoses), and wildlife reservoirs play a central role in the emergence and maintenance of pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, Ebola, influenza, and Nipah virus (Bennett et al., 2021).

Zoological research contributes to One Health through ecological surveillance of wildlife disease dynamics, characterization of host-pathogen relationships in reservoir species, and monitoring of habitat interfaces where spillover events are most likely. Integration of remote sensing data with wildlife movement models enables predictive mapping of spillover risk zones, supporting targeted surveillance and preventive interventions.

5. Emerging Trends in Botany

5.1 Plant Phenomics and Functional Botany

Plant phenomics—the large-scale, automated measurement of plant traits using imaging, spectroscopy, and sensor systems—has emerged as a critical discipline bridging the gap between genomic potential and observable agronomic performance. High-throughput phenotyping platforms employ RGB cameras, near-infrared spectroscopy, LiDAR, and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to measure dozens of traits simultaneously, including growth rate, biomass accumulation, canopy architecture, photosynthetic efficiency, and stress responses (Furbank & Tester, 2011).

These capabilities have transformed the temporal and cost dynamics of plant breeding programs. Traits that previously required multiple growing seasons to assess—such as drought tolerance, nitrogen use efficiency, and disease resistance—can now be quantified within weeks under controlled conditions, dramatically accelerating the breeding cycle. Fiorani and Schurr (2013) emphasized that phenomics is indispensable for understanding complex quantitative traits governed by multiple genes and their interactions with environmental variables, which account for the majority of economically important crop characteristics.

5.2 Plant–Microbe Interactions and the Soil Microbiome

The recognition of plants as holobionts—organisms whose fitness is inseparable from their associated microbial communities—has transformed understanding of plant nutrition, immunity, and environmental adaptation. The rhizosphere microbiome, comprising bacteria, fungi, archaea, protists, and viruses inhabiting the soil zone immediately surrounding plant roots, exerts profound influences on plant growth, nutrient availability, and disease resistance (Mendes et al., 2018).

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) enhance plant performance through nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, production of phytohormones such as indole-acetic acid, and suppression of pathogenic fungi through competitive exclusion and antibiosis (Vessey, 2003). Mycorrhizal fungi form symbiotic associations with the roots of approximately 80% of terrestrial plant species, dramatically expanding the root's effective absorptive surface area and enhancing phosphorus and water uptake under nutrient-limited or drought conditions. Practical applications of these insights include development of biofertilizers, biocontrol agents, and microbiome-based crop improvement strategies that reduce dependence on synthetic agrochemicals.

5.3 Conservation of Plant Diversity and Restoration Ecology

Global plant biodiversity faces acute threats from habitat conversion, invasive species, and climate-induced range shifts. Botanical institutions worldwide are increasingly engaged in ex situ conservation through seed banks, cryopreservation, tissue culture, and living collections, as complements to in situ habitat protection. The Svalbard Global Seed Vault, holding over 1.3 million seed samples, represents the apex of this conservation infrastructure.

Restoration ecology draws on botanical science to re-establish functional vegetation communities in degraded landscapes. Techniques including assisted migration, targeted revegetation with locally adapted genotypes, and facilitation of succession processes are being refined using landscape genomics to match seed provenances to projected future climate conditions. These interventions are critical for maintaining ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, watershed protection, and pollinator habitat across degraded agricultural and post-industrial landscapes.

6. Emerging Trends in Agricultural Sciences

6.1 Precision Agriculture and Digital Technologies

Precision agriculture represents the most significant paradigm shift in crop production since the Green Revolution. By integrating GPS guidance systems, satellite and drone remote sensing, IoT soil sensors, variable-rate application technology, and farm management information systems, precision agriculture enables spatially and temporally differentiated management of agricultural inputs at sub-field resolution (Zhang et al., 2019). This contrasts with conventional uniform management approaches that apply identical inputs across heterogeneous field conditions.

The practical benefits of precision agriculture are well-documented. Gebbers and Adamchuk (2010) documented reductions in fertilizer use of 15–30%, herbicide applications of 10–25%, and fuel consumption of up to 12% through precision approaches, while simultaneously improving crop yields by 3–8%. Drone-based multispectral imaging enables early detection of nutrient deficiencies, pest infestations, and irrigation stress before they become visually apparent, enabling timely corrective interventions.

6.2 Climate-Smart and Sustainable Agriculture

Climate change poses existential risks to global food security through shifting precipitation patterns, more frequent extreme weather events, increasing temperatures, and altered pest and disease dynamics. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) encompasses strategies that simultaneously increase productivity, enhance resilience to climate variability, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural systems (Altieri et al., 2015).

Table 3: Evidence-Based Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices and Their Documented Outcomes

Source: Compiled by authors based on Altieri et al. (2015) and Gebbers & Adamchuk (2010)

6.3 Agricultural Biotechnology: GMOs, Biofertilizers, and Biopesticides

Agricultural biotechnology encompasses a spectrum of interventions from marker-assisted selection and genomic selection in conventional breeding to transgenic genetic modification and CRISPR-based genome editing. Genetically modified crops engineered for pest resistance (Bt crops), herbicide tolerance, virus resistance, and enhanced nutritional profiles have been commercially deployed on over 190 million hectares globally, demonstrating significant yield benefits and reductions in insecticide applications in large-scale agricultural systems (Doudna & Charpentier, 2014).

Biofertilizers based on nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Rhizobium, Azospirillum), phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms, and mycorrhizal inoculants offer sustainable alternatives to energy-intensive synthetic fertilizers. Biopesticides derived from Bacillus thuringiensis toxins, entomopathogenic fungi, and plant-derived compounds provide ecologically selective pest control compatible with integrated pest management strategies. These biological inputs are particularly valuable for smallholder farmers in developing regions who face economic and logistical barriers to synthetic input access.

7. Interdisciplinary Applications: Toward a Converged Biological Framework

7.1 Ecosystem Services and Agroecology

The concept of ecosystem services—the benefits that functioning ecosystems provide to human societies—provides an integrative framework linking zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences. Pollination services, delivered by wild and managed bee populations, contribute an estimated USD 235–577 billion annually to global agricultural production (IPBES, 2019). Biological pest control by insectivorous birds, bats, spiders, and predatory insects reduces crop losses and pesticide dependence. Decomposer communities of fungi and bacteria maintain soil fertility and structure underpinning agricultural productivity.

Agroecology, which applies ecological principles to the design and management of food systems, explicitly leverages these interdisciplinary connections. By integrating knowledge of plant physiology, soil microbiology, animal ecology, and social science, agroecological approaches design farming systems that mimic the structural and functional diversity of natural ecosystems. Evidence from meta-analyses of over 300 agroecological projects globally demonstrates yield stability under climate stress comparable to conventional systems, with substantially superior biodiversity conservation outcomes (Altieri et al., 2015).

7.2 Food Security, Nutrition, and Public Health

Integrated biological research contributes directly to food and nutrition security through multiple pathways. Crop genetic improvement using genomic tools develops varieties with enhanced macro- and micronutrient profiles, addressing prevalent micronutrient deficiencies affecting over two billion people globally. Improved understanding of plant-microbe interactions informs the development of probiotic-based soil amendments that enhance crop nutritional quality. Zoological research on wildlife disease dynamics and antimicrobial resistance in livestock contributes to food safety by identifying pathways of pathogen entry into food systems.

7.3 Proposed Interdisciplinary Research Framework

The synthesis of evidence presented in this review supports a converged research framework that integrates zoological, botanical, and agricultural science perspectives. Table 4 presents the key interdisciplinary frameworks emerging from this convergence and their documented outcomes.

Table 4: Emerging Interdisciplinary Research Frameworks Integrating Biological Sciences

Source: Authors' synthesis based on reviewed literature

8. Challenges and Ethical Considerations

8.1 Ethical Dimensions of Gene Editing

The rapid deployment of CRISPR-Cas9 technology raises profound ethical questions that remain incompletely resolved in regulatory and scientific communities. Concerns include the potential for off-target genomic modifications with unforeseen consequences, the ecological risks of gene-drive systems that could permanently alter or eliminate wild populations, and the ethical acceptability of germline editing that transmits modifications to future generations. The 2018 case of heritable human genome editing in China highlighted the urgency of developing robust international governance frameworks. Transparent regulatory oversight, multi-stakeholder deliberation including community and indigenous perspectives, and precautionary deployment protocols are essential prerequisites for responsible biotechnological application (Doudna & Charpentier, 2014).

8.2 Data Privacy and Biopiracy Risks

The collection and open sharing of biological data—particularly genomic sequences, biodiversity records, and ecological datasets—creates significant data governance challenges. Concerns regarding genetic resource sovereignty, benefit-sharing equity, and biopiracy are particularly salient in biodiversity-rich developing nations where local communities hold traditional ecological knowledge that may inform—and commercially benefit—research conducted by foreign institutions. The Nagoya Protocol under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) provides an international legal framework for access and benefit-sharing, but implementation and enforcement remain inconsistent. Robust data governance frameworks, community consent protocols, and equitable collaborative research agreements are necessary to ensure that the benefits of biological knowledge are shared justly (Bennett et al., 2021).

8.3 Technological Disparities and Research Equity

Access to advanced biological research infrastructure—high-throughput sequencing platforms, computational clusters, satellite imagery subscriptions, precision agriculture equipment, and specialized laboratory reagents—is profoundly unequal between high-income and low-income countries. This technological disparity risks creating a two-tiered global biological sciences community where resource-rich institutions monopolize frontier research while institutions in biodiversity-rich developing regions remain dependent on external collaboration and funding. Targeted capacity-building investments, technology transfer agreements, open-source platform development, and regional research network formation are essential strategies for addressing this structural inequity (Kulski, 2020).

8.4 Climate Uncertainty and Adaptive Research Planning

The unpredictability of climate change trajectories—including non-linear tipping points, regional variation, and interactions with other drivers of environmental change—complicates long-term biological research planning and the translation of research findings into management recommendations. Species distribution models, yield forecasting systems, and conservation strategies developed under historical climate assumptions may rapidly become outdated or misleading. Adaptive management frameworks that build uncertainty explicitly into research designs, model ensembles, and monitoring protocols are essential for maintaining the relevance and reliability of biological science outputs in a changing world.

9. Future Prospects

The future trajectory of biological sciences will be shaped by several converging developments. Systems biology and integrative multi-omics modeling will enable increasingly comprehensive simulation of organism-environment interactions at cellular, organismal, and ecosystem levels, facilitating predictive rather than merely descriptive biological science. Advances in synthetic biology will expand the palette of biological solutions available for applications ranging from bioremediation to novel antibiotic discovery.

Nature-based solutions—ecosystem restoration, green infrastructure, and biodiversity-inclusive land management—will gain increasing prominence in climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, creating demand for applied research integrating conservation biology, landscape ecology, and agricultural science. Digital agriculture will mature from precision management of individual fields to integrated food system optimization encompassing supply chains, environmental footprints, and nutritional outcomes.

Perhaps most importantly, the accelerating convergence of biological sciences with data science, materials science, and social science will require fundamental changes in research training, institutional structures, and publication norms. Strengthening capacity in quantitative methods, interdisciplinary communication, and community-engaged research will be critical competencies for the next generation of biological scientists. Ensuring sustainable and diversified research funding—including public investment, philanthropic support, and industry partnerships structured to protect research independence—will determine whether these scientific possibilities are translated into equitable, practical, and enduring solutions for humanity.

CONCLUSION

This review has demonstrated that emerging trends in biological sciences are defined by a powerful convergence of zoology, botany, and agricultural sciences, accelerated by technological innovation, computational capability, and growing recognition of the interconnected nature of global biological challenges. Advances in genomics, CRISPR gene editing, environmental DNA monitoring, AI-driven analytics, plant phenomics, precision agriculture, and One Health integration have collectively expanded the scientific, practical, and societal impact of biological research.

The central contribution of this review lies in its integrative perspective, synthesizing insights from three traditionally separate disciplines into a unified analytical framework. This synthesis reveals that the most significant research frontiers and practical opportunities lie precisely at disciplinary interfaces: plant-microbe-soil-animal interactions in agroecological systems, wildlife-livestock-human health dynamics in zoonotic disease contexts, and biodiversity-productivity-sustainability trade-offs in food system design.

Realizing the full potential of these convergent biological sciences requires deliberate action to address persistent barriers: ethical governance of powerful biotechnologies, equitable data sharing frameworks, reduction of technological disparities, and integration of biological science insights into evidence-based policy. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, embracing systems-level thinking, and maintaining rigorous ethical standards, biological sciences are uniquely positioned to contribute transformative solutions to the defining challenges of the 21st century—food security, biodiversity conservation, climate adaptation, and pandemic prevention.

11. Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this research.

REFERENCES

1. Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(3), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2
2. Bennett, N. J., Finkbeiner, E. M., Ban, N. C., Belhabib, D., Jupiter, S., Kittinger, J. N., & Christie, P. (2021). Contributions of social sciences in understanding human dimensions of conservation. Conservation Biology, 35(2), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654
3. Bohmann, K., Evans, A., Gilbert, M. T. P., Carvalho, G. R., Creer, S., Knapp, M., & de Bruyn, M. (2018). Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 33(6), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.004
4. Cooke, S. J., Hinch, S. G., Crossin, G. T., Patterson, D. A., English, K. K., & Mathes, M. T. (2016). Biologging and animal behavior: Integrating sensors and telemetry for conservation. Ecology and Evolution, 6(15), 5280–5296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2254
5. Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
6. Fiorani, F., & Schurr, U. (2013). Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120137
7. Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., & Briscoe, D. A. (2017). Introduction to conservation genetics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
8. Furbank, R. T., & Tester, M. (2011). Phenomics—technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science, 16(12), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005
9. Gebbers, R., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Precision agriculture and food security. Science, 327(5967), 828–831. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183899
10. IPBES (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
11. Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2016). A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
12. Kulski, J. K. (2020). Computational biology in genomics and transcriptomics: Approaches and applications. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.01234
13. Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082674
14. Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2018). The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial microbes. Microbial Ecology, 75(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1033-1
15. Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., & Bengio, Y. (2019). Tackling climate change with machine learning. Nature Climate Change, 9, 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0456-8
16. Smith, A., Jones, B., & Williams, C. (2019). Genomics and bioinformatics: Transforming biological research. Journal of Molecular Biology, 431(15), 2560–2574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.014
17. Vessey, J. K. (2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255(2), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
18. Zhang, N., Wang, M., & Wang, N. (2019). Precision agriculture technology and applications. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.4019